Peterborough Community Legal Centre

               

150 King Street, 4th Floor

Peterborough, Ontario  K9J 2R9

 

Melinda Rees, B.A., LL.B.                                                                    Telephone (705) 749-9355

Executive Director                                                                                            Fax (705) 749-9360

 

Martha F. Macfie, B.A., LL.B.

Barrister & Solicitor

 

 

March 31, 2008

 

Kawartha Pine Ridge District School Board

1994 Fisher Drive

PO Box 719

Peterborough, ON  K9J 7A1

                             

To the Chairperson and Trustees of the Kawartha Pine Ridge District School Board:

 

Re: Motion to Censure Trustee Gordon Gilchrist

 

I am writing on behalf of the Board of Directors of the Peterborough Community Legal Centre to express the Board’s abhorrence for the sentiments expressed by Trustee Gilchrist in a letter he sent to Northumberlandtoday.com on February 12, 2008 using his Kawartha Pine Ridge District School Board (KPRDSB) email address.

 

The Legal Centre’s Board believes that Trustee Gilchrist’s conduct is sufficiently unbecoming that it would be appropriate for the KPRDSB to call on him to immediately resign his position with the Board. In the alternative, the Legal Centre supports the recommendation of the Equity and Diversity Committee of the KPRDSB that the Board censure Trustee Gilchrist and remove him from the Expulsion Committee of the Board.

 

The Legal Centre is a community legal clinic funded by Legal Aid Ontario to provide free, high quality poverty law services to low income residents of Peterborough City and County. Our Board and staff members have deep roots in Peterborough. Our clients are often new Canadians. The vision of the Board and staff of the Legal Centre is that the Legal Centre will work for “an equal and just community in which all people are aware of their legal rights and have access to justice and basic human security.” We believe in respecting diversity and in alerting the community to trends that affect our constituency.

 

The Chairperson’s Message on the Board website states that “schools need to be safe and welcoming environments for students and staff where learning skills are nurtured, and the unique and diverse contributions of each individual are valued and acknowledged”. How can students and staff members who are new Canadians feel safe and valued when a Board Trustee, using his official email address, publicly refers to immigrants as “enemies” who take Canadian jobs, “reduce each Canadian citizen’s share of this country’s wealth” , “congregate in ghetto-like enclaves” , “increase environmental pollution” and “make demands against the Canadian establishment”?

 

Trustee Gilchrist wrote a further letter dated February 19, 2008 which was published as a “retraction and apology”. In this letter he claims that his remarks “lacked clarity” but were not racist because they were intended as a commentary on citizenship by a private citizen.

 

There is nothing unclear about the racism of Trustee Gilchrist’s remarks. His February 12th letter is a catalogue of racially-based negative stereotypes and fear-mongering allegations. He must have known that these statements would foster a climate of hostility and disrespect for some students and staff members based on their race or ethnicity. He cannot claim, after the fact, that his remarks were those of a private citizen because he used his school board email address to forward the letter and made no attempt to explain that the views put forward were his own and did not reflect the opinion of the Board.

 

Trustee Gilchrist’s comments, regardless of motivation, are in flagrant breach of the Board’s Code of Conduct. Whatever his intentions, the impact on new Canadian staff members and students who may have been exposed to them is profoundly negative. The faith of the community in the KPRDSB’s commitment to equity and diversity can only be restored by his resignation from the Board.

 

There is a further concern with respect to Trustee Roy Wilfong’s remarks. Trustee Wilfong is quoted in the Examiner as saying that “he [Gilchrist] is entitled to his own opinion on citizenship … I don’t think his letter was racist.”  Assuming he was accurately quoted, Trustee Wilfong misses the point entirely. Trustee Gilchrist is entitled to his private opinions however distasteful, but in his public position, using the Board’s email address, he is obliged to follow the policies of the institution he is representing. If either Trustee Gilchrist or Wilfong disagree with the Board’s policies on equity and diversity, they should resign from the Board.

 

 

Yours very truly,

PETERBOROUGH COMMUNITY LEGAL CENTRE

 

 

 

Per:

Paul Atkinson, President

Board of Directors

Peterborough Community Legal Centre

 

 

cc. The Examiner, Northumberlandtoday.com

 

 

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

 

 

 

March 5, 2008

Mike Ma, Co-ordinator

Community Race Relations Committee

of Peterborough

205 Sherbrooke St., Unit D

Peterborough, Ontario K9J 2N2

 

Dear Mr. Ma:

 

The Northumberland Community Legal Centre strongly supports the Kawartha Pine Ridge District School Board’s actions in condemning Mr. Gilchrist.  We stand with the Community Race Relations Committee in denouncing his words and actions.

 

It is extremely discouraging, but hardly surprising, that a person who could make the comments outlined in Mr. Gilchrist’s letter to the editor would, when called to account, categorically deny that those comments were racist.  Yet all of his letters could be used as examples of the dictionary definition of racism: a belief that race is the primary determinant of traits and capacities.  His failure to acknowledge the harm that he has done, not only as a school Board trustee but as an individual member of our community, only serves as a further reminder of how entrenched racism is. 

 

The community has suffered greatly as a result of his letters. An apology will not repair the damage that has been done, nor will his resignation, although those would evidence some attempt on his part to make reparation.  What is needed from Mr. Gilchrist, and those in the community who supported his views in their own letters to the editor, is a change in attitude and beliefs based on an understanding of what racism is and what damage it does.  Only through education will there be any chance that such dreadful words, actions and effects will cease, and only through education will there be any hope for the elimination of racism.

 

As such, we believe that Mr. Gilchrist should be required to undertake an anti-racism training program.  However, since racism is a systemic issue, that training should also be required of all the other Board trustees as well, to ensure that the Board as a whole is working on eliminating racism within its structure.  Since we strongly believe that education will be the key, the Board can, together with other community partners, provide leadership in educating the public about racism to effect positive change. 

 

                                                                                    Yours truly,

 

                                                                                    Lois Cromarty

                                                                                    Barrister and Solicitor

                                                                                                                Executive Director

Northumberland Community Legal Centre